Yeast Infection - Treatment

Flucanzole - updated: 14 April 2009

Management of invasive candidal infections: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of fluconazole versus amphotericin B and review of the literature

Clin Infect Dis. 1996 Nov;23(5):964-

Anaissie EJ, Darouiche RO, Abi-Said D, Uzun O, Mera J, Gentry LO, Williams T, Kontoyiannis DP, Karl CL, Bodey GP.

We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing fluconazole and amphotericin B in the treatment of candidal infections. One hundred and sixty-four patients (60 of whom were neutropenic) with documented or presumed invasive candidiasis were assigned to treatment with either fluconazole (400 mg daily) or amphotericin B (25-50 mg daily; 0.67 mg/kg daily for neutropenic patients). Clinical response and survival rates were assessed at 48 hours, after 5 days, and at the end of therapy. Overall response rates to fluconazole and amphotericin B were similar (66% and 64%, respectively). There were no differences in response as related to site of infection, pathogen, time to defervescence, relapse, or survival rates between the groups. Adverse effects were more frequent with amphotericin B (35%) than with fluconazole (5%; P < .0001). The results of this study confirm that fluconazole is as effective as but better tolerated than amphotericin B in the treatment of candidal infections.

Publication Types:

• prospective, randomized, multicenter study

Fluconazole treatment of fungal infections in the immunocompromised host

Semin Oncol. 1990 Jun;17(3 Suppl 6):19-23

Meunier F.

Immunocompromised patients are predisposed to opportunistic fungal infections. Candidiasis is reported most frequently both as a localized infection (eg, oropharyngeal candidiasis) and as life-threatening systemic candidiasis. With relatively few antifungal agents in the clinical armamentarium, the optimal management of candidiasis remains controversial. Among the agents that are available, amphotericin B is difficult to administer, 5-fluorocytosine cannot be used alone due to the frequent emergence of resistant yeasts, and ketoconazole, which is effective for esophageal and oropharyngeal candidiasis, is not recommended for systemic candidiasis, especially in granulocytopenic patients. Recently, fluconazole, a new triazole antifungal agent, has been found to be active against Candida spp and is being studied in various clinical settings. In addition to its oral formulation, it is available for intravenous (IV) administration, which is a significant advantage in treating debilitated or noncompliant patients. In a randomized, double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of 100 mg/d oral fluconazole with that of 400 mg/d ketoconazole in cancer patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Although clinical and microbiological outcomes were similar for both groups, relapses occurred earlier in ketoconazole- than in fluconazole-treated patients. In another study, we administered fluconazole IV 100 to 300 mg/d to 13 patients, eight of whom had fungemia. Preliminary results are encouraging. Further studies of fluconazole as prophylaxis in granulocytopenic patients and as therapy for documented systemic candidiasis are under way. These studies are expected to define specific indications for fluconazole in immunocompromised patients.

Publication Types:

• Review

Maintenance fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis

N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 26;351(9):876-83

Sobel JD, Wiesenfeld HC, Martens M, Danna P, Hooton TM, Rompalo A, Sperling M, Livengood C 3rd, Horowitz B, Von Thron J, Edwards L, Panzer H, Chu TC.

BACKGROUND: No safe and convenient regimen has proved to be effective for the management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. METHODS: After inducing clinical remission with open-label fluconazole given in three 150-mg doses at 72-hour intervals, we randomly assigned 387 women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis to receive treatment with fluconazole (150 mg) or placebo weekly for six months, followed by six months of observation without therapy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of women in clinical remission at the end of the first six-month period. Secondary efficacy measures were the clinical outcome at 12 months, vaginal mycologic status, and time to recurrence on the basis of Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Weekly treatment with fluconazole was effective in preventing symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis. The proportions of women who remained disease-free at 6, 9, and 12 months in the fluconazole group were 90.8 percent, 73.2 percent, and 42.9 percent, as compared with 35.9 percent, 27.8 percent, and 21.9 percent, respectively, in the placebo group (P< 0.001). The median time to clinical recurrence in the fluconazole group was 10.2 months, as compared with 4.0 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). There was no evidence of fluconazole resistance in isolates of Candida albicans or of superinfection with C. glabrata. Fluconazole was discontinued in one patient because of headache. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term weekly treatment with fluconazole can reduce the rate of recurrence of symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis. However, a long-term cure remains difficult to achieve.

Publication Types:

• Randomized Controlled Trial

Fluconazole 150 mg single dose versus itraconazole 200 mg per day for 3 days in the treatment of acute vaginal candidiasis: a double-blind randomized study

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Feb 10;106(2):193-7

De Punzio C, Garutti P, Mollica G, Nappi C, Piccoli R, Genazzani AR.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of fluconazole 150mg single dose and itraconazole 200mg per day for 3 days in the treatment of the acute episode of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). METHODS: Double-blind randomized study conducted in three University centers. Patients with acute clinically and mycologically confirmed VVC were enrolled. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were enrolled; of them, 38 fluconazole and 32 itraconazole patients were evaluable. At the Day 7 visit, all but one fluconazole patients were cured or improved with eradication of the baseline pathogen obtained in all but two itraconazole patients. At the Day 21 visit, a 13% relapse rate was observed in both groups with all other patients cured or improved; eradication rates were 76% for fluconazole and 66% for itraconazole. Global symptom scores (GSS) were significantly more severe at baseline in fluconazole patients (P=0.003). Nevertheless, the slope of the GSS decrease between baseline and Day 7 was similar for both groups whilst GSS were identical at the last visit. Nineteen fluconazole patients reported 31 adverse events and 15 itraconazole patients reported 30 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Both oral antifungal treatments showed good clinical and mycological efficacy on the acute episode of VVC with a dramatic decrease of signs and symptoms 7 days after treatment initiation. Fluconazole in single dose warrants optimal compliance in patients who frequently experience more than one episode of VVC

Publication Types:

• Randomized Controlled Trial

DIFLUCAN® (Fluconazole Tablets) (Fluconazole Injection - for intravenous infusion only) (Fluconazole for Oral Suspension)

DIFLUCAN® (fluconazole), the first of a new subclass of synthetic triazole antifungal agents, is available as tablets for oral administration, as a powder for oral suspension and as a sterile solution for intravenous use in glass and in Viaflex® Plus plastic containers.

Publication Types:

• Article

Publication Types:

• Review